Important Ladies’s Well being Sources: The place to Discover Proof-Based mostly Data

Please observe: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identity.

Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being info shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.

In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are continually below fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.

These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important sources on every little thing from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial range. The type of info that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers individuals to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.

And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little clarification and nil accountability. If that appears like a conflict on girls, properly… you’re not improper.

When politics begins dictating what well being info we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to combat again. Which means getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed women’s health resources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t should find out about our personal rattling our bodies.

Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Data is Disappearing

For many years, federal well being businesses just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical info. However in current months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: hundreds of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.

This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.

Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed probably the most.

What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues

Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness info is crucial to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages^1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steering.

These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of important public well being info on subjects comparable to HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial range, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.^1,2,3,4.

Who This Impacts Most

The suppression of this info disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.

With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face important challenges in making knowledgeable choices about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.

Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to data—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.

[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]

Luckily, there are advocates on the market working to archive this info and make it obtainable to the general public⁵. This article accommodates an inventory of those recovered sources.

The Political Undermining of Public Well being

Whereas the transition of presidency from one occasion to a different mustn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness info, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.

The Position of Advocacy Organizations

Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being by coverage, schooling, and science.

For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Sex as a Biological Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a crucial step in making certain that illnesses, therapies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.

The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more crucial.

Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Ladies’s Well being Sources

Under is a curated record of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steering tailor-made to the distinctive well being issues of ladies of their reproductive years, throughout the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By searching for out and sharing these sources, we are able to collectively safeguard entry to important well being data and make sure that all girls have the data they should thrive at each stage of life.

Teen/Reproductive Years: 

Reproductive Health Access Project
Trains and helps main care clinicians to develop entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Gives free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.

Perimenopause/Menopause:

The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based info on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.

A number of Life Levels:

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being info. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively function of their care.

Planned Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for reasonably priced, high-quality providers and is the most important supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.

Our Bodies Ourselves
Gives rigorously vetted well being and sexuality info that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.

Healthy Women
Targeted on girls aged 35 to 64, this group supplies medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome getting older and empowered self-advocacy.

Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Women’s Mental Health: Reproductive Psychiatry Resource & Information Center
Gives reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life levels, with specialised assist for BIPOC people searching for culturally aligned care.

Center for Science in the Public Interest
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.

Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered

In a time when entry to reliable well being info is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply essential—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that assist knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.

So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your folks, your shoppers, your healthcare suppliers. Help the organizations doing the exhausting work to maintain this info alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value combating for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin

References

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
3. https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
4. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
5. https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
6. https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says